React Router v7 vs Leptos
Real-world performance comparison based on identical SaaS dashboard implementations.
React Router v7
VPS
The official React routing library, now evolved into a full-stack framework. React Router v7 represents the merger with Remix, bringing data loading patterns that eliminate waterfalls and keep your UI in sync with your URLs. Loaders fetch data before rendering, actions handle mutations, and the router manages pending/optimistic states automatically. Nested routes enable parallel data loading and isolated error boundaries. Type-safe links catch broken routes at build time. Compared to Next.js, React Router offers a more explicit data flow with loaders/actions and tighter Remix-style conventions. It's particularly strong for apps with complex forms and frequent user interactions.
Leptos
VPS (Rust)
A full-stack Rust framework using fine-grained reactivity. Leptos compiles to WebAssembly for near-native browser performance, with server functions that run seamlessly on the backend. The framework's signal-based reactivity (similar to SolidJS) enables surgical DOM updates without a virtual DOM. Server functions provide RPC-like calls with full type safety between client and server. Leptos can render on the server and hydrate on the client. For Rust developers, Leptos offers a compelling way to build web applications with the safety and performance guarantees Rust is known for. The learning curve is steep but the results are impressive.
Performance Metrics
Lower is better for all metrics. Green indicates the faster framework.
| Metric | React Router v7 | Leptos | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB (p50) | 50.2ms | 44.85ms | ▶ |
| TTFB (p95) | 51.55ms | 50.07ms | ▶ |
| LCP (p50) | 80ms | 72ms | ▶ |
| LCP (p95) | 86.2ms | 78.2ms | ▶ |
| CLS | 0 | 0 | = |
| TBT | 0 ms | 0 ms | = |
| LCP → TTFB | N/A | N/A | - |
| LCP → Load Delay | N/A | N/A | - |
| LCP → Load Duration | N/A | N/A | - |
| LCP → Render Delay | N/A | N/A | - |
| Performance Score | 98 | 98 | = |
| SEO Score | 83 | 83 | = |
| Accessibility Score | 80 | 86 | ▶ |
| Best Practices Score | 100 | 100 | = |
LLM Understanding (Claude Opus 4.5)
How efficiently Claude Opus 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.
| Metric | React Router v7 | Leptos | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration Time | 3232ms | 3206ms | ▶ |
| Exploration Tokens | 2623 | 2884 | ◀ |
| Files Examined | 8 | 5 | ▶ |
| Validation Accuracy | 73% | 72% | ◀ |
| Time Per File | 404ms | 641ms | ◀ |
| Tokens Per File | 2954 | 4138 | ◀ |
| Efficiency Score | 25.65 | 29.54 | ▶ |
LLM Understanding (Claude Haiku 4.5)
How efficiently Claude Haiku 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.
| Metric | React Router v7 | Leptos | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration Time | 3285ms | 2152ms | ▶ |
| Exploration Tokens | 2751 | 2880 | ◀ |
| Files Examined | 8 | 5 | ▶ |
| Validation Accuracy | 67% | 61% | ◀ |
| Time Per File | 411ms | 430ms | ◀ |
| Tokens Per File | 2969 | 4098 | ◀ |
| Efficiency Score | 19.22 | 34.01 | ▶ |
Build Metrics
| Metric | React Router v7 | Leptos | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size (JS) | 462.3KB | 1050.2KB | ◀ |
| Bundle Size (CSS) | 23.3KB | 0KB | ▶ |
| Build Time | 0s | 0s | = |
| Dependencies | 22 | 15 | ▶ |
Want to see more framework comparisons?
View All Comparisons