Next.js 16 vs Hono + htmx
Real-world performance comparison based on identical SaaS dashboard implementations.
Next.js 16
Vercel
Next.js deployed on its native platform—the way it was designed to run. Vercel's infrastructure is purpose-built for Next.js, providing automatic edge caching, instant rollbacks, and preview deployments for every git push. ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration) works seamlessly on Vercel with on-demand revalidation APIs and automatic cache invalidation across their global edge network. Edge Functions run your middleware in 30+ regions with sub-millisecond cold starts. This deployment demonstrates Next.js at its most optimized, with Vercel handling image optimization, analytics, and Web Vitals monitoring automatically.
Hono + htmx
VPS (Bun)
Ultrafast web framework meets hypermedia, running on Bun. Hono is a tiny (14KB), ultrafast web framework that runs everywhere. This variant uses Bun runtime for potentially faster startup times and request handling. Combined with htmx for HTML-over-the-wire interactivity, Hono on Bun produces minimal bundles while maintaining full interactivity—all without a JavaScript framework.
Performance Metrics
Lower is better for all metrics. Green indicates the faster framework.
| Metric | Next.js 16 | Hono + htmx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB (p50) | 44.7ms | 0ms | ▶ |
| TTFB (p95) | 44.86ms | 0ms | ▶ |
| LCP (p50) | 62ms | 0ms | ▶ |
| LCP (p95) | 70.2ms | 0ms | ▶ |
| CLS | 0 | 0 | = |
| TBT | 0 ms | N/A | - |
| LCP → TTFB | N/A | N/A | - |
| LCP → Load Delay | N/A | N/A | - |
| LCP → Load Duration | N/A | N/A | - |
| LCP → Render Delay | N/A | N/A | - |
| Performance Score | 96 | N/A | - |
| SEO Score | 100 | N/A | - |
| Accessibility Score | 88 | N/A | - |
| Best Practices Score | 100 | N/A | - |
LLM Understanding (Claude Opus 4.5)
How efficiently Claude Opus 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.
| Metric | Next.js 16 | Hono + htmx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration Time | 3883ms | N/A | - |
| Exploration Tokens | 3963 | N/A | - |
| Files Examined | 11 | N/A | - |
| Validation Accuracy | 100% | N/A | - |
| Time Per File | 353ms | N/A | - |
| Tokens Per File | 3245 | N/A | - |
| Efficiency Score | 43.28 | N/A | - |
LLM Understanding (Claude Haiku 4.5)
How efficiently Claude Haiku 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.
| Metric | Next.js 16 | Hono + htmx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration Time | 3029ms | N/A | - |
| Exploration Tokens | 3991 | N/A | - |
| Files Examined | 11 | N/A | - |
| Validation Accuracy | 99% | N/A | - |
| Time Per File | 275ms | N/A | - |
| Tokens Per File | 3225 | N/A | - |
| Efficiency Score | 55.84 | N/A | - |
Build Metrics
| Metric | Next.js 16 | Hono + htmx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size (JS) | 613.3KB | 47KB | ▶ |
| Bundle Size (CSS) | 23.3KB | 0KB | ▶ |
| Build Time | 0s | 0s | = |
| Dependencies | 18 | 5 | ▶ |
Want to see more framework comparisons?
View All Comparisons