Next.js 16 vs Leptos

Real-world performance comparison based on identical SaaS dashboard implementations.

Next.js 16

Next.js 16

VPS (Bun)

View Live Demo

The React meta-framework running on Bun runtime. Built by Vercel, Next.js supports SSR, SSG, ISR, and streaming—all configured per-route. This variant uses Bun runtime for potentially faster startup times and request handling. The App Router architecture brings React Server Components, nested layouts, and Server Actions. While Bun support for Next.js is unofficial, it works in practice and offers a comparison point for runtime performance. Ideal for teams wanting to benchmark Node.js vs Bun performance with their Next.js applications.

Leptos

Leptos

VPS (Rust)

View Live Demo

A full-stack Rust framework using fine-grained reactivity. Leptos compiles to WebAssembly for near-native browser performance, with server functions that run seamlessly on the backend. The framework's signal-based reactivity (similar to SolidJS) enables surgical DOM updates without a virtual DOM. Server functions provide RPC-like calls with full type safety between client and server. Leptos can render on the server and hydrate on the client. For Rust developers, Leptos offers a compelling way to build web applications with the safety and performance guarantees Rust is known for. The learning curve is steep but the results are impressive.

Performance Metrics

Lower is better for all metrics. Green indicates the faster framework.

Metric Next.js 16 Leptos Winner
TTFB (p50) 0ms 44.85ms ◀
TTFB (p95) 0ms 50.07ms ◀
LCP (p50) 0ms 72ms ◀
LCP (p95) 0ms 78.2ms ◀
CLS 0 0 =
TBT N/A 0 ms -
LCP → TTFB N/A N/A -
LCP → Load Delay N/A N/A -
LCP → Load Duration N/A N/A -
LCP → Render Delay N/A N/A -
Performance Score N/A 98 -
SEO Score N/A 83 -
Accessibility Score N/A 86 -
Best Practices Score N/A 100 -

LLM Understanding (Claude Opus 4.5)

How efficiently Claude Opus 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.

Metric Next.js 16 Leptos Winner
Exploration Time N/A 3206ms -
Exploration Tokens N/A 2884 -
Files Examined N/A 5 -
Validation Accuracy N/A 72% -
Time Per File N/A 641ms -
Tokens Per File N/A 4138 -
Efficiency Score N/A 29.54 -

LLM Understanding (Claude Haiku 4.5)

How efficiently Claude Haiku 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.

Metric Next.js 16 Leptos Winner
Exploration Time N/A 2152ms -
Exploration Tokens N/A 2880 -
Files Examined N/A 5 -
Validation Accuracy N/A 61% -
Time Per File N/A 430ms -
Tokens Per File N/A 4098 -
Efficiency Score N/A 34.01 -

Build Metrics

Metric Next.js 16 Leptos Winner
Bundle Size (JS) 642.6KB 1050.2KB ◀
Bundle Size (CSS) 23.4KB 0KB ▶
Build Time 0s 0s =
Dependencies 19 15 ▶

Want to see more framework comparisons?

View All Comparisons