Next.js 16 vs Fastify + React

Real-world performance comparison based on identical SaaS dashboard implementations.

Next.js 16

Next.js 16

VPS (Bun)

View Live Demo

The React meta-framework running on Bun runtime. Built by Vercel, Next.js supports SSR, SSG, ISR, and streaming—all configured per-route. This variant uses Bun runtime for potentially faster startup times and request handling. The App Router architecture brings React Server Components, nested layouts, and Server Actions. While Bun support for Next.js is unofficial, it works in practice and offers a comparison point for runtime performance. Ideal for teams wanting to benchmark Node.js vs Bun performance with their Next.js applications.

Fastify + React

Fastify + React

VPS

View Live Demo

Node.js high-performance web framework combined with React SSR. Fastify is one of the fastest Node.js frameworks, built on a robust plugin architecture with JSON Schema validation and automatic OpenAPI documentation. This implementation uses Fastify as the server with custom React SSR integration. Fastify's encapsulation model keeps plugins isolated, while hooks provide fine-grained request lifecycle control. Ideal for teams with existing Node.js/Express experience who want better performance and structure. Fastify's plugin ecosystem covers everything from rate limiting to WebSocket support.

Performance Metrics

Lower is better for all metrics. Green indicates the faster framework.

Metric Next.js 16 Fastify + React Winner
TTFB (p50) 0ms 42.95ms ◀
TTFB (p95) 0ms 46.06ms ◀
LCP (p50) 0ms 70ms ◀
LCP (p95) 0ms 78.2ms ◀
CLS 0 0 =
TBT N/A 0 ms -
LCP → TTFB N/A N/A -
LCP → Load Delay N/A N/A -
LCP → Load Duration N/A N/A -
LCP → Render Delay N/A N/A -
Performance Score N/A 99 -
SEO Score N/A 92 -
Accessibility Score N/A 80 -
Best Practices Score N/A 100 -

LLM Understanding (Claude Opus 4.5)

How efficiently Claude Opus 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.

Metric Next.js 16 Fastify + React Winner
Exploration Time N/A 3580ms -
Exploration Tokens N/A 3244 -
Files Examined N/A 10 -
Validation Accuracy N/A 80% -
Time Per File N/A 358ms -
Tokens Per File N/A 3060 -
Efficiency Score N/A 27.95 -

LLM Understanding (Claude Haiku 4.5)

How efficiently Claude Haiku 4.5 understands the codebase. Based on exploration + validation tests.

Metric Next.js 16 Fastify + React Winner
Exploration Time N/A 1869ms -
Exploration Tokens N/A 3278 -
Files Examined N/A 10 -
Validation Accuracy N/A 68% -
Time Per File N/A 187ms -
Tokens Per File N/A 3061 -
Efficiency Score N/A 26.22 -

Build Metrics

Metric Next.js 16 Fastify + React Winner
Bundle Size (JS) 642.6KB 283.6KB ▶
Bundle Size (CSS) 23.4KB 23.1KB ▶
Build Time 0s 0s =
Dependencies 19 21 ◀

Want to see more framework comparisons?

View All Comparisons